I'm afraid those who didn't live through that time won't understand. But we won't forget.
Ivan Trufanov, Unfortunately, they don't understand anymore... It's very far away for them... it's already a fantasy... Well, the fact is that WE won't forget it... that's a fact... The main thing here is to prevent it from returning.
So yes, MANY people really rose from this, maybe 20 or even 25 “talented” businessmen and entrepreneurs, the current pride of Forbes and the mainstay of Offshore!
Unfortunately, Forbes' pride is 90 percent criminal and our shame.
Ivan Trufanov, But here they constantly tell me that Vitya is jealous of Roma in a lumpen way, that's why he stinks at the great Motherland, and wants to take everything back and divide it among the Sharikovs.
That's why it's always easy to remove a governor or official.
Ivan Trufanov, Everyone is tied to theft, that's the essence of the system and the vertical of power. An honest person is an enemy, civil society is the death of their business.
Maybe someone is jealous, like, "I should be in their place!" I find this situation a bit silly. Putting others down and getting rich myself isn't my thing. What's sad is how easily people go down.
Maybe someone is jealous, "I should be in their place!" I find this situation a bit silly. Putting others down and getting rich myself isn't my thing. What's sad is how easily people fall.
Ivan Trufanov, The rules of the game should be the same for EVERYONE, and let everyone get rich according to their talent and hard work. JUSTICE is not leveling the playing field, but fair competition.
Ivan Trufanov, The rules of the game should be the same for EVERYONE, and let everyone grow rich according to their talent and hard work. JUSTICE is not leveling, but fair competition.
Viktor Kirillov, so you came to the kindergarten to take a photo, and there's your competitor. What should you do? The kindergarten management should have given one of you a favor, then your meeting wouldn't have happened. That would have been fair.
Viktor Kirillov, so you came to the kindergarten to take photos, and your competitor is there. What should you do? The kindergarten management should have given one of you a pass, then your meeting wouldn't have happened. That would have been fair.
Flounder and Light Herring, It would have been fair to decide this at an open parent-teacher meeting, publicly and openly. But when Roma buys an entire factory full of slaves with the same voucher, and Vitya only buys a bottle of vodka, that's not competition.
As life shows, healthy competition doesn't exist there, let alone here. There is lobbying for interests. And the interest that is lobbied for is the one that has something to offer the lobbyist.
As experience shows, healthy competition doesn't exist there, let alone here. There's lobbying. And the interests that lobby are meant to benefit the lobbyist.
Ivan Trufanov, That's why the State is needed, to oversee compliance with these rules, and not just to celebrate Unity and Independence Day.
Something happened to me back then. In a small Ural town, there weren't a single photo service centers left. The mayor's office asked me to open a photo studio and gave me the space for free. Since they couldn't help me any further, the mayor personally took me to three kindergartens and four schools and told me that only this person, meaning me, could work there. The next day, the photographer who serviced those establishments came to see me and told me to wait for some thugs who would talk to me. That's the kind of lobbying and competition we have.
As experience shows, healthy competition doesn't exist there, let alone here. There's lobbying. And the interests that lobby are those that have something to offer the lobbyist.
Ivan Trufanov, Competition is a struggle, and it can't be completely healthy. But do you think Apple and Intel couldn't reach an agreement? Of course they could, but market rules don't allow it, otherwise they face billion-dollar fines. In the end, the best or cheapest one takes over their sector...
A story happened to me back then. In a small Ural town, there weren't a single photo service centers left. The mayor's office asked me to open a photo studio and gave me the space for free. Since they couldn't help me any further, the mayor personally took me to three kindergartens and four schools and told me that only this person, meaning me, could work there. The next day, the photographer who serviced those establishments came to see me and told me to wait for some gangsters who would talk to me. That's the kind of lobby and competition we have.
Ivan Trufanov, So nothing has changed since then, maybe just the mayor is different, and the color of the jackets of the gangsters with their parliamentary badges.
Not a very good example: monopolies won't compete with each other; they either fight or negotiate, dividing up the remaining space. Where there are monopolies, there is no competition.
Not a very good example. Monopolies won't compete with each other; they either fight or negotiate, dividing up the remaining space. Where there are monopolies, there is no competition.
Ivan Trufanov, in this case, I'm talking about a struggle where the consumer wins.
We don't know how consumers would benefit if there were at least 20 manufacturers, not just two giants. Today, China, for example, is proof of this: they're keeping it out of 5G, holding it back by every means possible, both technological and sanctions. So much for competition. Only a select few can profit, colluding among themselves to create the appearance of competition.
We don't know how consumers would benefit if there were not two giants, but at least 20 manufacturers. Today, China, for example, is proof of this: they're keeping them out of 5G, holding them back by every means possible, both technological and sanctions. So much for competition. Only a select few can profit, colluding among themselves to create the appearance of competition.
Ivan Trufanov, This is what state and international institutions, democracy, and free journalism are supposed to achieve. And yet, in our State Duma, a well-known deputy publicly describes how Moscow accepts boxes of cash from regional governors... and nothing happens, no prosecutorial investigation, no libel charges, nothing...
Ivan Trufanov, The rules of the game should be the same for EVERYONE, and let everyone get rich according to their talent and hard work. JUSTICE is not equalization, but fair competition.
Viktor Kirillov, That's what rules are for, to be uniform!!!
And as for the rules that should be uniform, for a gay the rule is to give himself to his own kind, I am against it, and he is against my “against it.” And in many directions it is so
We don't know how consumers would benefit if there were at least 20 manufacturers, not just two giants. Today, China, for example, is proof of this: they're keeping it out of 5G, holding it back by every means possible, both technological and sanctions. So much for competition. Only a select few can profit, colluding among themselves to create the appearance of competition.
Ivan Trufanov, Firstly, only giants systematically (not through breakthroughs) develop the world. And China is being kept out precisely because of gross violations of competition rules – despite low quality, tender prices are 30-40% lower, and the state covers the difference for its companies.
You're forgetting, when you talk about freelance journalism, that all media outlets have an owner
Ivan Trufanov, Absolutely right, but when there are several owners, then the interests are different, that is, competition again. And when Kiselevs and Solovyovs sing ONE song, then it's really sad ((
You see, these are convincing justifications for their not always fair play. China's opponents are thus lobbying for the interests of their giants, who have no use for competition. Because the question is, who will fleece the entire world? There can only be one answer. If the stakes were low, no one would look at China.
[quote][The press is an important asset. Puppeteering and brainwashing are always relevant.] Ivan Trufanov, It's clear who argues with that. That's why public oversight and glasnost (a forgotten Gorbachev phrase) are needed. Civil society is the only cure for such an affliction. But while the crowd is on the Maidan, swapping Pupkin for Zalupkin, life won't magically change for the better.
You see, these are convincing justifications for their not always fair play. China's opponents are thus lobbying for the interests of their giants, who have no use for competition. Because the question is, who will fleece the entire world? There can only be one answer. If the stakes were low, no one would even consider China.
"In the end, the best or cheapest one takes over its sector..." You said. This is the war of competitors, where all means are fair. As practice shows, all it takes is for the dissatisfied to buy a stake (read: squeeze out some of the profits), and the quality issue will immediately disappear.
I think the British didn't waste their time with "Universe 25." And there's also the question of who will be the more humane—the hungry or the sated. Because the dead aren't saved, they're decorated. So...fso according to plan.
Well, the fact is that WE won't forget it... that's a fact... The main thing here is to prevent it from returning.
Ivan Trufanov, It's clear who argues with that. That's why public oversight and glasnost (a forgotten Gorbachev phrase) are needed. Civil society is the only cure for such an affliction. But while the crowd is on the Maidan, swapping Pupkin for Zalupkin, life won't magically change for the better.
And there's also the question of who will be the more humane—the hungry or the sated.
Because the dead aren't saved, they're decorated.
So...fso according to plan.
I think they were saving us, what do you think?