The author had a really great idea, gluing a naked chick to the wall. I just don't understand why the author started taking photos of this in the first place?
girl. Author. Nevermind - @ I don't use Fskim. Then I can only recommend buying a dictionary.
Pavel Ryzhenkov, Google the word "eclecticism", maybe it will help. By the way, hiding behind all this nonsense, you still haven't answered my question.
I don't like the first photo. The second one is interesting. And you should try to photograph the way you see it yourself, not imitate someone else. A copy won't be better than the original anyway.
I don't like the first photo. The second one is interesting. And you should try to shoot the way you see it yourself, not imitate someone else. A copy won't be better than the original anyway.
Pavel Ryzhenkov, I'm not talking about imitation. I'm talking about the quality of the photography.
I'm talking about the level of photography. Ignat Safronov,
Do you know many photographers here at our photography club who are on the level of Helmut Newton, to suggest shooting at the same level as him? ) Pavel Ryzhenkov, Why so eager to get going? I'm talking about aspiration. Go ahead and surpass Newton.
Ignat Safronov, agreed. Starting Monday, I begin my journey to "surpassing" him.
maxanin =- perhaps the best solution! Ignat - You wanted something new, not a template... and again we return to antiquity... or art moves in a spiral... Ignat Safronov,
Really, a breakthrough? The last ones weren't exactly pleasing to the eye. Square or rectangle? A square draws attention to the shape. A rectangle draws attention to the model. So I'm wondering, what would I like to see? As they say, the struggle between the spiritual (read: form) and the physical (model). Anyway, I can't tell you where I settled.
Did you and Ignat have some kind of backstory that got you so excited out of nowhere? ..I don't think so. I don't recall. It's just that he regularly comes to me to give me a bad grade on my work.
Pavel Ryzhenkov, so he believes in you, but you don't believe in yourself.
He thinks you could do better, and you, that you've achieved perfection.
If parents, seeing their child write their first or even fifth squiggle, were delighted and stopped there, what would happen to humanity?
But thank God, children are first pushed to school, then to a profession, then their wives force them to rise through the ranks and earn a living.
You earn your living through photography. Don't you really need to develop yourself?
I also see no reason to respond with personal attacks to Ignat Safonov's perfectly reasonable comment. I think you can defend your point of view in a civilized manner, as is done at diploma defenses, exams, and so on.
Danuta, Yeah, I'm talking. But most often it's just pearls.
Want to check?
Ignat Safronov, first, I'm fervently hoping for "sparks of God's wrath," and not just some spam... Regarding my own work, that's for sure. Second... and... yes, it would be interesting)) (If you're interested, come on in... I never push anyone away from my site...
Pavel Ryzhenkov, I understand that when people speak Russian, they speak different languages.
Could you please clarify?
I earn my living in a completely different way. Photography is a passion. A hobby.
And yet:
About me: Reportages, wedding photography, corporate events and children's parties. Studio, interior, or outdoor photography. Photography for VKontakte, Odnoklassniki, Facebook, or personal/private albums and dating sites.
The photo is published, period. At the time of publication, the author decided to leave it as is. At the time, it was true. I'm sure if you hang the photo on the wall and cut off a little bit every month and rotate it clockwise and counterclockwise, within a year there would be nothing left of the photo. The photo is good, and it's a shame that many resort to personal attacks during the discussion.
I just don't remember how I offended you so much.
Yeah, I do. But more often than not, it's just pearls of truth.
Want to check?
By the way, it fails on the "padonkavski" part.
Then it's all okay.
Otherwise, I'm remembering. I'm worried.
It's nostalgic! )
And you should try to photograph the way you see it yourself, not imitate someone else.
A copy won't be better than the original anyway.
Do you know many photographers here at our photography club who are of Helmut Newton's caliber, so you can suggest shooting at the same level as him?
I still don't understand what you're suggesting to me?
But no later than Monday. Tuesday at the latest.
Ignat - You wanted something new, not a template... and again we return to antiquity... or art moves in a spiral... Ignat Safronov,
And the photo is very nice. And the girl has a nice face. And her legs are weightless.
because the "reversal" is really and in Maxim's version there's a sense of weightlessness.
Pavel Ryzhenkov, did you have some kind of backstory with Ignat that made you so excited out of nowhere?
Square or rectangle? A square draws attention to the shape. A rectangle draws attention to the model. So I'm wondering, what would I like to see?
He just comes to me regularly to give me a grade for work.
He's an old friend.
but you don't believe in yourself.
He thinks you could do better,
and you, that you've achieved perfection.
If parents, seeing their child write their first or even fifth squiggle, were delighted and stopped there, what would happen to humanity?
But thank God, children are first pushed to school, then to a profession, then their wives force them to rise through the ranks and earn a living.
You earn your living through photography. Don't you really need to develop yourself?
I also see no reason to respond with personal attacks to Ignat Safonov's perfectly reasonable comment.
I think you can defend your point of view in a civilized manner, as is done at diploma defenses, exams, and so on.
...sorry for the long answer.
Second... and... yes, it would be interesting)) (If you're interested, come on in... I never push anyone away from my site...
I earn my living in a completely different way. Photography is a passion. A hobby.
As for defending photography... Why? No one will like you anyway. So there's no point in breaking swords.
Peace be with you, brothers and sisters.
Could you please clarify? And yet: Do you do this for free?
But I don't "live" from photography.
I have a different profession.
But of course, I take pictures for free, too.