I don't think the author's framing is bad, but the bike shouldn't have been centered in the frame. By moving it to the edge, the central composition could have been lost... IMHO.
Serg Dav., Thanks for your attention, I can say for myself that I couldn't bring myself to remove the space and the three roads in the background (in the books I read that there should be 1 or 3 - although maybe this is a rule for PP and the main characters, and for ZP this rule cannot be extended much), but I repeat, I kept three roads as an additional association (the transition from one road of "childhood" to many - in this case, three)
In my opinion, the emphasis is a bit weak... Either closer to the bicycle, to emphasize its size, or, what's much stronger, add the figure of a boy, thoughtfully looking into the distance... But these are just my fantasies.
Mikhail 57 World, I appreciate your opinion (thanks, Mikhail). Initially, I didn't have the boy pensively looking into the distance at hand ☺. Thanks to the criticism, I formed the basis of this shot later, but I should have taken it before, then there would have been fewer mistakes – the blurriness of the PP and ZP, the central location – to reflect the transition from childhood, the roads to the PP and ZP should have been the focus, and the bicycle an associative detail of childhood. It turns out that I only used 30% of the potential impact on the main idea of the photo. Alas, I admit.
Slobodan Miladinović, Evgeniy (EV6795), Sergey48 Thanks for the recommendations!
I liked the work!
thoughtfully looking into the distance... But these are just my fantasies.