Alexey Krik, there's absurdity and a kindly, dark humor here. Unitsyn's photo is just bad. I saw a conflict on Facebook today. Solodar posted a Venice photo, Geller said it was bad, Tereshchenko said it was good. So where can we go?
Alexey Krik, there's absurdity and a kindly, dark humor here. Unitsyn's photo is just bad. I saw a conflict on Facebook today. Solodar posted a Venice photo, Geller said it was bad, Tereshchenko said it was good. So where can we go?
Serg Tix, strictly speaking, Tereshchenko didn't say "the photo is good"... -)
Sergey Chubarov, "Anton Tereshchenko is awesome, what can I say."
Serg Tix, it's perfectly understandable that this applies to Leonid's comment, for example, and not just the photo... however, it could also be understood the way you suggest... -)
I saw a conflict on Facebook today. Solodar posted a Venice photo, Geller said it was bad, Tereshchenko said it was good. So where can we go?
After so many years, it would be possible to determine not only a position, but also criteria for evaluating a photograph.
Alexey Krik, It's all more interesting there. The photography really isn't very good.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1345846218824355&set=a.1242394205836224.1073741831.100001969708340&type=3&permPage=1
Leonid wasn't lucky with either the color or the light to create a solid landscape. So Geller is technically right.
What's funny to me is that I don't see any outstanding photographs from Geller's own works (at least online) from the same area. Not to mention, show me this anonymously http://www.photoline.ru/photo/1071150676?rzd=au and I'll say it's Rolov.
But this guy has been taking photos longer than I've been alive, so maybe I'm missing something.
Regarding the second one, I agree. There's something Rolov-esque about it. :-)
Immediately recalled http://www.rosphoto.com/images/u/articles/1503/4_35.jpg
Although I easily identified Geller's daughter.
He only has "friends" there, that's why you can't see it.