View crop My habit of inner comfort narrows my perception to this scale, putting me entirely in a comfort zone. ) PS: A step later isn't necessary at all; it's more original and lively. I generally think that one of the photographer's mistakes is thinking, "Oh, it would be better if..." After all, it's always better the way it's already been captured!
"One step later..." What about continuous shooting?
Vlad, at first I was shooting things like this with continuous shooting. Then, as an experiment, I decided to shoot single shots. And, you know, it turned out better somehow.
8ele8, well, yeah, a step later would have been more pressing. Although, thinking is also useful) Vlad, "a step later..." - that's true, in the order of "nihil est ab omne parte beatum"
Vlad, I was shooting this kind of thing with bursts at first. Then, as an experiment, I decided to shoot single shots. And, you know, it just got better.
f2.0, it's like that old, but very good, ad from TV Park magazine: "What if you miss something interesting?"
PS: A step later isn't necessary at all; it's more original and lively.
I generally think that one of the photographer's mistakes is thinking, "Oh, it would be better if..." After all, it's always better the way it's already been captured!
And what about continuous shooting?
Vlad, "a step later..." - that's true, in the order of "nihil est ab omne parte beatum"
Malakhov, I understand.