Oh my, how cute! All the mushrooms will burn!)))))) I'm getting a kitten tomorrow))))))
Pieter Gynt, this is a cat soaring in nirvana from the splendor of contemplating the world around him, taken at 18:55, completely smeared with Vaseline Should I send you a couple dozen?)
Alekseenko Alexey Nikolaevich, Are you kidding me? Are you? )))) I just shamed one of the participants in the Agora meeting for adding something)))) And you're doing the same?))))
Larisa Kolesnikova, It's time to say something on Kitty Day)))) By the way! I'm looking at mushrooms. They're all different))) and I'm no expert)))))) I looked in an encyclopedia—it seems like half of them are poisonous. I looked in another—half of them are healthy? Should I fry them or not?)))))
Larisa Kolesnikova, It's time to say something on Kitty Day)))) By the way! I'm looking at mushrooms. They're all different))) and I'm no expert)))))) I looked in an encyclopedia – it seems half are poisonous. I looked in another – half are healthy? Should I fry them or not?)))))
Pieter Gynt, Castaneda recommends eating them raw..............
Larisa Kolesnikova, On Kitty Day, you have to say something)))) By the way! I'm looking at mushrooms. They're all different))) and I'm no expert)))))) I looked in an encyclopedia - it seems half are poisonous. I looked in another - half are healthy? Should I fry them or not?)))))
Pieter Gynt, your inner voice will tell you) it never lies!
... WOW, and you are the one who ACCUSES me of Editor Abuse and "OVERFRIED" , I simply HIGHLY recommend - CARAVAGGIO and REMBRANDT - UNRIVALED MASTERS OF LIGHT AND SHADOW... BUT STILL, FOR THE 48TH TIME, I wish you Good Luck in Understanding!!!!
... WOW, and you are the one ACCUSING me of Editor Abuse and "OVERFRIED" art, I simply HIGHLY recommend it - CARAVAGGIO and REMBRANDT are UNRIVALED MASTERS OF LIGHT AND SHADOW... BUT STILL, FOR THE 48TH TIME, I wish you Good Luck in Understanding!!!!
Andrey Voitsekhov, did you see Photoshop here?))) Please write like a human being, otherwise the font size inconsistencies are as hard to perceive as your creations.... Take an example from Rembrandt... he didn't pepper his writing with emoticons...
... WOW, and you are the one ACCUSING me of Editor Abuse and "OVERFRIED" art, I simply HIGHLY recommend it - CARAVAGGIO and REMBRANDT are UNRIVALED MASTERS OF LIGHT AND SHADOW... BUT STILL, FOR THE 48TH TIME, I wish you Good Luck in Understanding!!!!
Andrey Voitsekhov, did you see Photoshop here?))) Please write like a human being, otherwise the font size inconsistencies are as hard to perceive as your creations.... Take an example from Rembrandt... he didn't pepper his writing with emoticons...
Alekseenko Alexey Nikolaevich, .... I DID NOT SEE ANYTHING HERE AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ,for the 49th time, good luck in your "creativity"
... WOW, and you are the one ACCUSING me of Editor Abuse and "OVERFRIED" art, I simply HIGHLY recommend it - CARAVAGGIO and REMBRANDT are UNRIVALED MASTERS OF LIGHT AND SHADOW... BUT STILL, FOR THE 48TH TIME, I wish you Good Luck in Understanding!!!!
Andrey Voitsekhov, did you see Photoshop here?))) Please write like a human being, otherwise the font size inconsistencies are as hard to perceive as your creations.... Take an example from Rembrandt... he didn't pepper his writing with emoticons... Alekseenko, Alexey Nikolaevich, .... I DID NOT SEE ANYTHING HERE AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! , for the 49th time, good luck in your "creativity"
Andrey Voitsekhov, it's normal that you didn't see anything.... don't worry.....just don't tell Rembrandt and Caravaggio.....and don't try - I'm not interested in your comments, I won't learn anything new from them, and you're wasting your nerves.....if you want to be a photographer - be one.....just remember, photos speak for a photographer, not words.....I wish you thunderous and prolonged applause from your fans on VK and try not to get into polemics on a subject you don't understand....I'm talking about painting.....and please spare me your scribbles.....it hurts my eyes...Happy New Year.
... WOW, and you are the one ACCUSING me of Editor Abuse and "OVERFRIED" art, I simply HIGHLY recommend it - CARAVAGGIO and REMBRANDT are UNRIVALED MASTERS OF LIGHT AND SHADOW... BUT STILL, FOR THE 48TH TIME, I wish you Good Luck in Understanding!!!!
Andrey Voitsekhov, did you see Photoshop here?))) Please write like a human being, otherwise the font size inconsistencies are as hard to perceive as your creations.... Take an example from Rembrandt... he didn't pepper his writing with emoticons... Alekseenko, Alexey Nikolaevich, .... I DID NOT SEE ANYTHING HERE AT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! , for the 49th time, good luck in your "creativity"
Andrey Voitsekhov, it's normal that you didn't see anything.... don't worry.....just don't tell Rembrandt and Caravaggio...and don't try - I'm not interested in your comments, I won't learn anything new from them, and you're wasting your nerves...if you want to be a photographer - be one...just remember, photos speak for a photographer, not words...I wish you thunderous and prolonged applause from your fans on VK and try not to get into polemics on a subject you don't understand...I'm talking about painting...and please spare me your scribbles...it's an eyesore...Happy New Year.
Alexey Nikolaevich Alekseenko, Happy New Year!, here's this "snapshot" A child could have taken your avatar, but when a man (you) takes the picture, it's simply a disaster (although for you it's a masterpiece) - really, what can I talk about with you, a "modest" photo artist of the International Federation :znaika, YES, IN COMPARISON WITH YOUR "MASTERPIECES", I'm an amateur.....what MY works speak for me (I agree with you) - AND I (AS YOU SAY) - WILL BE A PHOTO ARTIST, AND NOT A CHILD SNAPPING CATS!
Yeah, what can I say, "modest" Andrey Voitsehov, an amateur photographer with the International Federation of Photographers, of course... the best [b]STUDENT OF CARAVAGGIO and REMBRANDT can't be WRONG... or did they waste their time on you?
By the way, when you see them again, give them my warmest regards, I mean, when they invite you to their next master class.
Here you go, to help you understand the situation:
Andrey Voitsekhov, you reek)) seriously, not like a child... calm down, please, you are a great photo artist, and I am an insignificant worm, invading the space of genius, incomprehensible to mere mortals)) Just don’t write here anymore - I’m tired of the abundance of emoticons and punctuation marks... I’m not worthy of your genius, I’m sorry..)
Andrey Voitsekhov, you reek)) seriously, so unchildish... please calm down, you are a great photo artist, and I am an insignificant worm, invading the space of genius, incomprehensible to mere mortals)) Just don't write here anymore - I'm tired of the abundance of emoticons and punctuation marks... I'm unworthy of your genius, I'm sorry..)
mordofot, and I ask you to stay and please don't mangle the nicknames and names of your interlocutors in 2015. You can do that this year and in 2016, but let's not do it next year
mordofot, I ask you to stay and ask you not to mangle the nicknames and names of your interlocutors in 2015. You can do that this year and in 2016, but next year, let's not.
Okay, Master, I won't mangle the names of my interlocutors... only fools.
So, back to our cats. Benders aren't that mean, and they don't bother anyone. Explain to me, who doesn't understand, what's so good about this photo, what's there to see? It's unlikely this photo will help my psyche, as it's so blurry it's hard to look at.
So let's get back to our cats. Benders aren't that mean, and they don't bother anyone. Explain to me, someone who doesn't understand, what's so good about this photo? What's there to see?
Roman, by and large, it's okay, a cat photo... there was a Friday cat flash mob, taken from the archive, no claims to be a masterpiece, taken without editing, as is... dragging around a visual image of a kitten... I don't like detail and, as many people here say, tech quality... And do you all come to me specifically under the guise of cats? I've lost count - I even had to delete one. Those who don't come back - all under the guise of cats... are they covered in honey or something...
So let's get back to our cats. Benders aren't that mean, and they don't bother me. Explain to me, who doesn't understand, what's so good about this photo, what's there to see. It's unlikely this photo will help the psyche because it's so blurry, it's hard to look at.
So, let's get back to our cats. The Benders aren't that mean, and they don't bother me. Explain to me, who doesn't understand, what's so good about this photo, what's there to see? It's unlikely this photo will help my psyche; it's hard to look at because it's blurry.
I looked, thanks! But I don't like that kind of thing. I love landscapes and macro. I've been taking pictures since childhood, starting with the Smena 8, and I loved landscapes. I don't understand this kind of creativity, but I just don't like it. I have a lot of Zenit lenses left over from those days. I really love them and still use them to this day, but I don't like the monocle.
I looked, thanks! But I don't like that kind of thing; I love landscapes and macro. I've been taking pictures and loving landscapes since childhood, starting with Smena 8, and I don't understand this kind of creativity; I just don't like it, that's all. There are a lot of Zenit lenses left over from those days; I really love them and still use them to this day, but I don't like the monocle.
Roman, it's not about what you shoot with, but how... Kolosov has a good say on this in the second link... You're trying to turn photography into painting, confusing methods and visual means... and you've found a way - post-processing, not realizing that the principle of constructing a painting is fundamentally different from that of photography. You sacrifice composition and form for the sake of "prettiness," you replace form with color, you sacrifice visual connections, and in general the language of the image, symbolism... What you do will never be painting, but it's also very far from photography... you've replaced imagery with detail, elevating it to the rank of main advantage... it's more like computer art... I don't mean that such creativity has no right to exist, just make a distinction from photography...
The photo is unnatural...The quality is poor...I don't like it.
Inna, it's not the poor quality, it's the monocle. And you can probably guess which photos show poor quality... Poor quality is caused by chromatic aberrations, digital noise, an incorrectly exposed sky, for example. Photography involves many tools, different lenses, and sometimes even the lens is smeared with Vaseline to change the texture of the "photographic brush." You still have a lot to learn before you can objectively judge the quality of photographs.
Inna, and again, you shouldn't take Marina Golub's word for it. Look at and the digital noise and incorrectly exposed sky. I suspect there are also chromatic aberrations if you convert this frame back to color and enlarge it...... and read the comments carefully! I'm interested in something else - does a monocle ever have bad quality, or does everything shot with it automatically become good? Ask Marina about this, she's unlikely to want to answer me!
Gentlemen admins, given certain events, it seems tempting to add minus signs to comments in addition to upvotes. So that, once a certain number of upvotes are reached, a comment with minuses would automatically collapse in the feed until it's labeled "show," remaining accessible to those who appreciate the author's prose. I understand that there's a semblance of this feature, in the form of displaying "substantive" comments. However, this feature seems imperfect. For example, comment #46, which contained the author's "suspicions" regarding a photograph, coupled with a casual and rather loose reference to another commenter's personality, was deemed "substantive" by someone, and now this empty talk has been imbued with some higher meaning. And there's no point in negotiating in such cases. Think again about upvotes and minuses. It certainly won't make things worse, and the feed will be noticeably cleaner. P.S. It would be good if the pluses weren't anonymous.
Nikolaevich!!! From the bottom of my heart, I congratulate you on this double holiday! Happy Epiphany! And Happy Birthday! I wish you health, good luck, and success in all your endeavors and endeavors!!!
Nikolaevich!!! From the bottom of my heart, I congratulate you on this double holiday! Happy Epiphany! And happy birthday! I wish you health, good luck, and success in all your endeavors and endeavors!!!
All the mushrooms will burn anyway!)))))
I'm getting a kitten tomorrow))))))
It opened.
Are you kidding me? Are you? ))))
I just shamed one of the participants in the Agora meeting for adding something)))) And you're doing the same?))))
and your daughter!
Uffff))))
I was about to add you to the flash mob's blacklist)))))
I'm so tired of filling out the quarantine paperwork))))))
You have no heart:))
It's time to say something on Kitty Day))))
By the way! I'm looking at mushrooms. They're all different))) and I'm no expert)))))) I looked in an encyclopedia—it seems like half of them are poisonous. I looked in another—half of them are healthy? Should I fry them or not?)))))
it never lies!
But we're going our own way! Why do we need some Castaneda-esque thing?
If my inner voice deceives me, it will be your fault.
Alekseenko Alexey Nikolaevich, and where does the Vaseline come from?
"What the heck, and a bow on the side"
---------------------------------------------------
A bow is required in the photo!
All site users are invited to participate.
.-.
By the way, when you see them again, give them my warmest regards, I mean, when they invite you to their next master class.
Here you go, to help you understand the situation:
mordofot, and I
ask you to stayand please don't mangle the nicknames and names of your interlocutors in 2015. You can do that this year and in 2016, but let's not do it next yearHome Photo has been accepted.
Alexey Nikolaevich
Why unnatural?
And when can we talk about "good" quality?
And you can probably guess which photos show poor quality...
Poor quality is caused by chromatic aberrations, digital noise, an incorrectly exposed sky, for example.
Photography involves many tools, different lenses, and sometimes even the lens is smeared with Vaseline to change the texture of the "photographic brush." You still have a lot to learn before you can objectively judge the quality of photographs.
P.S. It would be good if the pluses weren't anonymous.
[img]http://s6.rimg.info/7e4e5ec51663dddd61e2923d666c4993.gif[/img]
Joy, love, and happiness!
[img]http://s9.rimg.info/4fa38ca4827e1b3ffba9fd2041e25b1d.gif[/img]