Good photo. No complaints

Thanks guys!

Excellent! Really gentle)

View crop There's just something not quite right here. Clearly, it's moving, but...

Well, it's a matter of taste, of course. I used to think that motion blur was bad, too. But over time, I realized it was necessary; otherwise, things would end up looking glassy, frozen, and undynamic. Incidentally, I encountered this recently while in Europe, carefully examining clothing ads in boutiques and fashion stores. They were great photos, but wherever the model moved, there was some detail, but it was blurred. It immediately looked different. I think if the ballerina had been completely sharp, it wouldn't have been the same. Thanks to EVERYONE who liked it! Photo of the day. I'm pleased.

It would be interesting to hear your opinion about this photo:

I'll grease everything up, as it seems to me)

The noise was really suppressed. Noise isn't always a bad thing. Nice photo

Next, ISO 200

I completely agree with the author - movement is absolutely necessary here, otherwise the photo would be lifeless

This is true to life, but it's hard to understand the emotions of a ballerina

I'd like more light on the face. But it's clear you can't put it there yourself! But if you're being picky, the pack is brighter than the face. Ideally, a spot on the face would be nice. But this is a reportage, not a production, and everything here is wonderful. And engineers can create better than designers and professional photographers.

as if in flight!