Well, listen to the critics. Firstly, this site is filled with people who mostly grab landscapes and cats. Secondly, the critics are either lazy, or they're just as interested in landscapes and cats. And a minimalist photo requires reflection, for example, on what the photo brings to reality, or what the photo brings to the image, or consider the ephemeral nature of a photo, an ephemeral drawing, an ephemeral story about an ephemeral god... or could reality have gotten lost or confused somewhere here...?
Edu, and it (a very complex work) seemed to work out for me - there was almost nothing left from the original and from the emotions evoked by the original, and there was no Photoshop - only cropping, angle and natural lens blur.
Edu, and it (a very complex piece) seems to have turned out well for me – almost nothing remains of the original and the emotions it evoked, and no Photoshop – just cropping, angle, and natural lens blur.
Impressor, I don't argue, it's all true. You're great. I can't find anything similar, I don't remember – we'll see. I'd love to hear your response under your other photo.
Edu, and it (a very complex piece) seemed to work out for me – almost nothing remained of the original and the emotions it evoked, and no Photoshop – just cropping, angle, and natural lens blur. Impressor, I don't argue, it's all true. You're great. I can't find anything similar, I don't remember – we'll see. I'd love to hear a response under your other photo.
Edu, I remember, it was on Volna. But whose it was, I completely forgot.
Edu, and this (a very complex piece) seemed to work out for me – almost nothing remained of the original and the emotions it evoked, and no Photoshop – just cropping, angles, and natural lens blur. Impressor, I don't argue, it's all true. You're great. I can't find anything similar; I don't remember – we'll see. I'd love to hear a response under your other photo. Edu, I remember, it was on Volna. But whose it was, it completely slipped my mind.
Ignat Safronov, I had an absolutely magnificent collection of similar ones. I can't find it, I can't say :-(
Impressor, I don't argue, that's exactly it. You're great.
Thank you... Or was that sarcasm? I was a bit expecting a harsh response. I'm surprised everyone is reacting so calmly to my presumptuous, provocative, and self-aggrandizing remarks. On the other hand, it's nice to be in such respectable company.
Edu, exactly, Ginzburg. I looked for him myself today, but couldn't find him. He's persistently associated with Bulochkina, but he stubbornly denies it. Even at one exhibition, their names were listed side by side: Elena Bulochkina (USA), Victor Ginzburg (USA).
Edu, that's right, Ginzburg. I looked for him myself today, but couldn't find him. He's persistently associated with Bulochkina, but he stubbornly denies it. Even at one exhibition, their names were listed side by side: Elena Bulochkina (USA), Victor Ginzburg (USA).
Impressor, viewer's opinion: yours is better. There's soul and emotion here, and they're wonderful, because the photo speaks to the viewer, who can empathize with, excuse me, the "models" in the photo. Consider the models to be the author's work, as the original's visualization has been significantly altered.
Rada, this is the ideal I was striving for. It's very gratifying that at least one viewer perceives the work as intended. But I realize I fell somewhat short of that ideal Thank you for such a flattering comment.
I'd be interested to hear your opinion on two more of my works: They were created using a similar approach – a direct shot, but the modernization of reality occurs not through depth of field, but by converting to monochrome. 1 2 - for some reason this photo was hidden in the "home" section – I don't understand why, and I don't know where to ask.
Odelena, thanks for the clarification. But what does this mean? A dozen moralists will remove all nudes to their home, a dozen Islamists will remove all images of people to their home, 10,000 morons will remove all photos with meaning to their home, and we'll only be looking at cat photos???
Impressor, What did you think? The audience determines the site's content. Don't worry, your page has everything you need – anyone who wants to see it will.
Well, listen to the criticism. Firstly, this site is filled with people who mostly grab landscapes and cats. Secondly, the critics are either lazy, or they're just as interested in landscapes and cats. A minimalist photo requires reflection, for example, about what the photo brings to reality, or what the photo brings to the image, or consider the ephemeral nature of a photo, an ephemeral drawing, an ephemeral story about an ephemeral god... or could reality have gotten lost or confused somewhere here...?
Edu, Impressor, I don't argue, it's all true. You're great. Thank you... Or is that sarcasm? I was expecting a harsh response. I'm surprised everyone reacts so calmly to my presumptuous, provocative, and self-aggrandizing statements. On the other hand, it's nice to be in such respectable company.
Impressor, what are your goals in posting your photos on this site? Please allow no more than three. Thanks in advance!
DMITRY APALIKOV will communicate with photographers: receive criticism of his work, practice criticizing others' work, and promote his vision of photography.
Ollgierdas, I might have worked on it, but it turns out it's not an original idea. Bulochkina has already worked in this direction—someone mentioned it in the discussion a few comments above.
There's very little that makes one Bulochkina stand out among millions. Moreover, even though the idea is the same, the results of that idea are different for each person. That's the unique charm.
Secondly, the critics are either lazy, or they're just as interested in landscapes and cats. And a minimalist photo requires reflection, for example, on what the photo brings to reality, or what the photo brings to the image, or consider the ephemeral nature of a photo, an ephemeral drawing, an ephemeral story about an ephemeral god... or could reality have gotten lost or confused somewhere here...?
I really like yours.
Theoretical preparation for perception is necessary.
..it's really interesting..
Some people manage to take a unique look at the familiar, while others initially find it difficult to even understand what the author sees..
What's it like to be the first?
Thank you for such a flattering comment.
I'd be interested to hear your opinion on two more of my works:
They were created using a similar approach – a direct shot, but the modernization of reality occurs not through depth of field, but by converting to monochrome.
1
2 - for some reason this photo was hidden in the "home" section – I don't understand why, and I don't know where to ask.
But what does this mean? A dozen moralists will remove all nudes to their home, a dozen Islamists will remove all images of people to their home, 10,000 morons will remove all photos with meaning to their home, and we'll only be looking at cat photos???