Igor Ryzhikov, I don't want to read boring theory, just try shooting with a 70mm and f/2.8. You'll be surprised how much of what you called Photoshop comes straight from the lens. And I think the only Photoshopped parts here are the brightness correction and the conversion to black and white, which are all done well.
Igor Ryzhikov, study Photoshop and optics! You seem like a good photographer, but I don't understand how this blur could be mistaken for Photoshop? It's just that the leaves are close to the lens and are blurred quite a bit. Sometimes it even creates artificial fog. You certainly made me laugh... I'm shocked. iskra, sorry for the swearing
Everything is very well processed. The picture is good.
Mad Rybnik,
And I think the only Photoshopped parts here are the brightness correction and the conversion to black and white, which are all done well.
You seem like a good photographer, but I don't understand how this blur could be mistaken for Photoshop? It's just that the leaves are close to the lens and are blurred quite a bit. Sometimes it even creates artificial fog.
You certainly made me laugh... I'm shocked.
iskra, sorry for the swearing
Thanks for the support