Vladimir Bayker, Then why isn't the model one-eyed and without a cockatoo on her shoulder?
Nikolay Semenov, The author doesn't photograph characters; he photographs people without any drama, as they are. Everything else is just paraphernalia, whether it's a cockatoo or a felt tricorne with a nylon blouse. I haven't lied about anything; have I correctly stated your credo, Vladimir Bayker?
Nikolay Semenov, The author doesn't create characters, he captures people without any drama, as they are. Everything else is paraphernalia, like a cockatoo or a felt tricorn with a nylon blouse. I haven't lied at all; have I correctly stated your credo, Vladimir Bayker?
Viktor Kirillov, you've got it all wrong, as always... Felt tricorn, cotton blouse. Look for the drama on your page; I have enough for work.🤣
Viktor Kirillov, you've got it all wrong, as always... Felt tricorn, cotton blouse. Look for the drama on your page; I have enough of it for work.
Vladimir Bayker, Felt is made by felting wool. To create striking and durable accessories, sheep or rabbit wool is used, as well as exotic options like New Zealand deer wool. You're also being a big shot about cotton; pure cotton hasn't been in cheap textiles for a long time; it's viscose (polyester). So your systematic education has failed again; it's just crap like all the others.
Vladimir Bayker, Felt is made by felting wool. To create striking and durable accessories, they use sheep or rabbit wool, as well as exotic options like New Zealand deer wool. You're also being flamboyant about cotton; pure cotton has long been absent from cheap textiles; it's viscose (polyester). So, your systematic education has failed again; it's crap like all the others.
Viktor Kirillov, you demonstrate your profound knowledge, commendable. But, as always, you've screwed up. These are reenactors; they recreate the attributes as accurately as possible, so you've missed the boat again. You, like all those phony people, want to show off how smart and talented you are, but only through other people's work and in words. All the best to you. I hope you understand.🤣
Viktor Kirillov, you demonstrate your profound knowledge, commendable. But, as always, you've screwed up. These are reenactors, they recreate the attributes as accurately as possible, so you've missed the mark again. You, like all phony artists, want to show off how smart and talented you are, but only behind other people's work and in words. All the best. I hope you understand.
Vladimir Bayker, And how interestingly I've screwed up! I called felt "woolen wool," but in a cotton blouse I saw 40% viscose, judging by the fabric's characteristic sheen. The reenactors may have tried, but those authentic materials don't exist anymore, and of course, the young ladies in blouses didn't serve in the navy, and the Pomor fisherwomen wore different attire. So, we'll have to see who sat where. Why are you so eager to defend the textile industry? I have no complaints about it, and the photo itself is just a typical reportage of costumed people (like at any wedding).
Vladimir Bayker, And how curiously I stumbled, calling felt "felted wool," but seeing 40% viscose in a cotton blouse, judging by the fabric's distinctive sheen. Perhaps the reenactors tried, but those authentic materials don't exist today, and certainly the young ladies in blouses didn't serve in the navy, and the Pomor fisherwomen wore different attire. So, who's where, we'll have to see. And why are you so eager to defend the textile industry? I have no complaints about it, and the photo itself is basically the same—a typical reportage-style staging of costumed people (like at any wedding).
Viktor Kirillov, you're confusing salty with cold again. Reenactors aren't just about parading around in costumes or playing war games; for many, it's a way of life. They have plenty of small businesses where they recreate clothing, utensils, and weapons using old techniques—they're not like costumed people at weddings. Natural fabrics are still being produced, and there's still plenty of old ones left. Women didn't serve on ships—it was considered bad luck—but as camp followers, they were employed at ports and bases, and their activities were regulated by military regulations, hence the semblance of a uniform. This shot is purely a news report; check out the focus.
Viktor Kirillov, you're confusing salty with cold again. Reenactors aren't just about parading around in costumes or playing war games; for many, it's a way of life. They have plenty of small businesses where they recreate clothing, utensils, and weapons using old techniques; they're not like costumed people at weddings. As for natural fabrics, they're still being produced, and there's still plenty of old ones left. Women didn't serve on ships—it was considered bad luck—but as camp followers, they were employed at ports and bases, and their activities were regulated by military regulations, hence the semblance of a uniform. This shot is purely reportage, check the focal length.
Vladimir Bayker, You once scolded me for not being able to stop in time, and you yourself said you were trying to prove to me that you've read a book about sailors and seen a movie. The reenactors are wonderful people, and they have an interesting hobby. The felt on the tricorne was cut with a knife, quite authentic, but the neckline of the blouse was machine-stitched, not hand-stitched, as honest reenactors should be. The focal length is 370 mm, and the girl didn't see you and looks past the lens into the sea distance, well, call it a reportage if you want (spontaneous portrait) And I also know about one woman, a girl, she dressed up as a hussar and fought in a cavalry regiment on an equal basis with men, there is even a movie about this, "The Hussar Ballad"; now the reenactors really let loose, they sewed enough aiguillettes and mentiks alone for an entire squadron.
Vladimir Bayker, And how curiously I stumbled, calling felt "felted wool," but seeing 40% viscose in a cotton blouse, judging by the fabric's distinctive sheen. Perhaps the reenactors tried, but those authentic materials don't exist today, and certainly the young ladies in blouses didn't serve in the navy, and the Pomor fisherwomen wore different attire. So, who's where, that's something we'll have to see. And why are you so eager to defend the textile industry? I have no complaints about it, and the photo itself is basically the same—it's just a typical reportage-style staging of costumed people (like at any wedding). Viktor Kirillov, you're confusing salty with cold again. Reenactors aren't just about parading around in costumes or playing war games; for many, it's a way of life. They have plenty of small businesses where they recreate clothing, utensils, and weapons using old techniques—they're not like costumed people at weddings. Natural fabrics are still being produced, and there's still plenty of old ones left. Women didn't serve on ships—it was considered bad luck—but as camp followers, they were employed at ports and bases, and their activities were regulated by military regulations, hence the semblance of a uniform.
This shot is purely a news report; check the focal length.
Vladimir Bayker, that swineherd left me alone because he was placed on the emergency list. Now he's pestering you. He's neither smart nor talented enough to become famous in photography, so he pesters decent people like a drunk before the radio.
Guys, why can't a woman stay the way GOD made her?! Even tiny girls, before they even realize it, already love their mothers' clothes. From the moment we're born, we're destined to dress up. How else are we supposed to please YOU?! Look at this pretty girl! Clothes suit her, even if they're made of paper. What a man! A man should follow a face like that...
Guys, why can't a woman stay the way GOD molded her?! Even tiny girls, before they even realize it, already love their mothers' clothes. From the moment we're born, we're destined to dress up. How else are we supposed to please YOU?! Look at this pretty girl! Clothes suit her, even if they're made of paper. What a man! You'd have to follow a piquant face like that...
Tatyana Kulchitskaya, A woman is also a mother, a worker in production, and, more recently, a defender of the fatherland. Why are you suddenly standing up for your sister, Tatyana? March 8th is still a long way off, or is there some malicious comment attacking women that I'm hiding?
Guys, why can't a woman stay the way GOD molded her?! Even tiny girls, before they even realize it, already love their mothers' clothes. From the moment we're born, we're destined to dress up. How else are we supposed to please YOU?! Look at this pretty girl! Any outfit suits her, even if it's made of paper. What a man! You have to follow a piquant face like that...
Tatyana Kulchitskaya, there's a saying among photographers: "If you don't know what to wear, wear it naked."
Guys, why can't a woman stay the way GOD made her?! Even tiny girls, before they even realize it, already love their mothers' clothes. From the moment we're born, we're destined to dress up. How else are we supposed to please YOU?! Look at that pretty girl! The outfit suits her, even if it's made of paper. What a man! You have to follow a piquant face like that...
Tatyana Kulchitskaya, well, people have to prove themselves somehow. It's not working with your own photos, so you can dance around with tambourines to other people's photos, and even then it doesn't work out very well. And stupid questions, and stupid comments... Sometimes you're at a loss for what to say, and you can't tell them where they deserve it, they'll get offended.
The author doesn't photograph characters; he photographs people without any drama, as they are. Everything else is just paraphernalia, whether it's a cockatoo or a felt tricorne with a nylon blouse. I haven't lied about anything; have I correctly stated your credo, Vladimir Bayker?
And how interestingly I've screwed up! I called felt "woolen wool," but in a cotton blouse I saw 40% viscose, judging by the fabric's characteristic sheen. The reenactors may have tried, but those authentic materials don't exist anymore, and of course, the young ladies in blouses didn't serve in the navy, and the Pomor fisherwomen wore different attire. So, we'll have to see who sat where. Why are you so eager to defend the textile industry? I have no complaints about it, and the photo itself is just a typical reportage of costumed people (like at any wedding).
This shot is purely a news report; check out the focus.
You once scolded me for not being able to stop in time, and you yourself said you were trying to prove to me that you've read a book about sailors and seen a movie. The reenactors are wonderful people, and they have an interesting hobby. The felt on the tricorne was cut with a knife, quite authentic, but the neckline of the blouse was machine-stitched, not hand-stitched, as honest reenactors should be. The focal length is 370 mm, and the girl didn't see you and looks past the lens into the sea distance, well, call it a reportage if you want (spontaneous portrait) And I also know about one woman, a girl, she dressed up as a hussar and fought in a cavalry regiment on an equal basis with men, there is even a movie about this, "The Hussar Ballad"; now the reenactors really let loose, they sewed enough aiguillettes and mentiks alone for an entire squadron.
A woman is also a mother, a worker in production, and, more recently, a defender of the fatherland. Why are you suddenly standing up for your sister, Tatyana? March 8th is still a long way off, or is there some malicious comment attacking women that I'm hiding?