Yeah, it seems like ZhRyzhov has lost his edge. Instead of mass-circulation reports from the cornfield, the RD is receiving photos rejected by the passport office. Congratulations to Photocenter on such a wonderful choice. Remind me, dear author (you mentioned this not long ago), how many people/heads per hour do you capture photos of, and how many GB do you outsource to hired tuning specialists for processing?
Yeah, it seems like ZhRyzhov has lost his position. Instead of mass-circulation reports from the cornfield, RD received heads rejected by the passport office. Congratulations to Photocenter on such a wonderful choice. Remind me, dear author (you mentioned this not long ago), how many people/heads per hour do you capture photos of, and how many GB do you outsource to hired tuning specialists for processing?
Viktor Kirillov, you're ridiculous, and also narrow-minded. RD, any website has an automatic function, and it doesn't bring any moral, much less material, dividends.
I've always given, give, and will give material to specialists for processing. The main thing here is quality and deadlines. Previously, I gave it in meters, then in gigabytes. The point is the same: it doesn't affect my income in any way, since it is immediately included in the estimate as a separate line item. But it saves me from unnecessary fuss and frees up a ton of time. But you, as a lone artisan without a motor, won't understand this.🤣
Viktor Kirillov, you're ridiculous, and also limited. RD, any website has an automatic function, and it doesn't bring any moral, much less material, dividends.
I've always, and will continue to, outsource my work to specialists for processing. Quality and deadlines are paramount. I used to outsource by the meter, then by the gigabyte. The bottom line is, it doesn't affect my income at all, as it's immediately factored into the budget as a separate line item. It saves me a lot of hassle and frees up a ton of time, but you, as a lone artisan, without a motor, wouldn't understand that.
Vladimir Bayker, So, you produce photo products as an artel, in industrial quantities, you provide a budget, great, well done. But how do you get paid? By the piece, by the piece, with a bonus, from the human workers, or by the hour? As a "solo artisan," I'm incredibly interested in the latest technologies in portrait production.
RD is an automatic count, I know, but it is real art connoisseurs who like it, and I congratulate the Photo Center on that.
Vladimir Bayker, So, you produce photo products as an artel, in industrial quantities, you provide a budget, great, well done, but how do you get paid? By the piece, by the piece, a bonus, from the employees, or by the hour? As a "solo artisan," I'm incredibly interested in the latest technologies in portrait production.
RD has automatic counting, I'm aware, but it's the real art connoisseurs who like it, and I congratulate Photocenter on that.
Viktor Kirillov, there's no point in telling you anything; you'll never put it into practice anyway. You have your own things: kindergartens, schools, and weddings, and your own equipment.
Vladimir Bayker, I certainly won't, and I certainly won't post this "assembly-line hackwork" of collective creativity on a PHOTO website.
Viktor Kirillov, you have a short memory... I've never posted a single working shot on websites, only my own personal amusements. But you, on the other hand, are incapable of understanding all the benefits of collective work, because you're a solitary artisan.
Because you're a lone artisan.[/quote] Vladimir Bayker, Yeah, a lone artisan, because I'll never put my name to someone else's crap, but you, like Ermakov with "Suffragettes," have a collective work, and no one to ask for artistry.
because you're a lone artisan. Vladimir Bayker, Yeah, a lone artisan, because I'll never sign my name to someone else's crap, but you, like Ermakov with "Suffragettes," have a collective work, and no one to hold you accountable for the artistry.
Viktor Kirillov, and being a lone artisan, you automatically lose out on many technical opportunities, and accordingly, your segment is severely limited, hence the schools and kindergartens, budget-friendly weddings, and video recording of events for the needs of the local administration. It's truly sad.
Viktor Kirillov, and being a lone artisan, you automatically lose out on many technical opportunities, and accordingly, your segment is severely limited, hence schools and kindergartens, budget-friendly weddings, and event video recording for local administration needs. It's truly sad.
Vladimir Bayker, Yes, I agree. Of course, if I were part of a management team, I could shoot oligarchs' weddings. But I thought we were talking about the art of artists, not about optimizing the bombing of kindergartens.
Vladimir Bayker, Yes, I agree. Of course, if I were a manager, I could shoot oligarchs' weddings. But I thought we were talking about artists' art, not about optimizing the bombing of kindergartens.
Viktor Kirillov, if I were a manager, I definitely wouldn't be able to.🤣
So you're the one who started talking nonsense...🤣
[quote]So you're the one who started spouting nonsense... Vladimir Bayker, I just congratulated Photocenter on another... [quote] Viktor Kirillov, you might as well have congratulated them on Bastille Day.🤣
Vladimir Bayker, Well, congratulations! Your next group photo is a miscarriage.
Viktor Kirillov, you'll have to wait forever, since my group photo is only about work, and here I post my own fun stuff. And look for the miscarriages that smell like carrion on your page.🤣
Viktor Kirillov, you'll have to wait forever, since my collective post only features work, and here I post my own entertainment. As for the miscarriages that smell like carrion, look for them on your page.
Vladimir Bayker, And speaking of entertainment, there's a certain optical effect in this photo: at a quick glance, it sometimes seems like the woman's shoulder is either left (the black material) or right (the one with the transparent insert). It's funny.
Vladimir Bayker, And speaking of fun, this photo has a certain optical effect. At a quick glance, it sometimes looks like the woman's shoulder is either left (black material) or right (with a transparent insert). Funny.
Viktor Kirillov, they both have the same transparent insert.😅
Vladimir Bayker, I'm not talking about the cut of the dress, but about an optical illusion. The sheer insert sometimes looks like it's on her chest, but she's turned her head to what looks like her left shoulder (of the black fabric). Look at the small photo; the effect is more noticeable that way.
I've always given, give, and will give material to specialists for processing. The main thing here is quality and deadlines. Previously, I gave it in meters, then in gigabytes. The point is the same: it doesn't affect my income in any way, since it is immediately included in the estimate as a separate line item. But it saves me from unnecessary fuss and frees up a ton of time. But you, as a lone artisan without a motor, won't understand this.🤣
So, you produce photo products as an artel, in industrial quantities, you provide a budget, great, well done. But how do you get paid? By the piece, by the piece, with a bonus, from the human workers, or by the hour? As a "solo artisan," I'm incredibly interested in the latest technologies in portrait production.
RD is an automatic count, I know, but it is real art connoisseurs who like it, and I congratulate the Photo Center on that.
Vladimir Bayker,
I definitely won't, and I certainly won't post this "assembly-line hackwork" of collective creativity on a PHOTO website.
Vladimir Bayker,
Yeah, a lone artisan, because I'll never put my name to someone else's crap, but you, like Ermakov with "Suffragettes," have a collective work, and no one to ask for artistry.
Yes, I agree. Of course, if I were part of a management team, I could shoot oligarchs' weddings.
But I thought we were talking about the art of artists, not about optimizing the bombing of kindergartens.
So you're the one who started talking nonsense...🤣
Vladimir Bayker,
I just congratulated Photocenter on another... RD.
Vladimir Bayker,
I just congratulated Photocenter on another... [quote]
Viktor Kirillov, you might as well have congratulated them on Bastille Day.🤣
Well, congratulations, under your next group photo – a miscarriage.
And speaking of entertainment, there's a certain optical effect in this photo: at a quick glance, it sometimes seems like the woman's shoulder is either left (the black material) or right (the one with the transparent insert). It's funny.
I'm not talking about the cut of the dress, but about an optical illusion.
The sheer insert sometimes looks like it's on her chest, but she's turned her head to what looks like her left shoulder (of the black fabric). Look at the small photo; the effect is more noticeable that way.