Kerim, you're always welcome... It couldn't be simpler - regular cherry syrup, I didn't have anything else on hand at the time... Thanks for the question and comment...
There's a lot to learn from you. From people like you, and grateful criticism. It's fantastic, beyond words. The idea, the lighting... I'd LOVE to see the same thing, but frontally, without the diagonal (as an option). Perhaps it would look more poster-like without the monumentality?
I have a lot to learn from you. From people like you, and criticism with gratitude. It's wonderful, beyond words. The idea, the light... I have a GOOD desire to see the same thing, but frontally, without the diagonal (as an option). Maybe it would look more poster-like without the monumentality?
Anton Leshchinsky, thank you for your kind words, Anton, but I'm just an AMATEUR and nothing more... (without a hint of coquetry)... Regarding the frontal angle—won't a head-on perspective lead to a flat picture???—that's the question... at the moment, the pen gives at least some sense of volume in the frame precisely from this angle... and still, THANK YOU!!!
And it should be flat (not flat), in my opinion. We perceive space (especially in graphics, which should initially emphasize flatness and conventionality, unlike painting) (Rudolf Arnheim "Art and Visual Perception", N.N. Volkov "Composition in Painting") by conventional features. And this is not necessarily chiaroscuro and aerial perspective (occlusion, for example). And the "AMATEUR" or "PROF." framework is very vague, especially in the field of photography. In Belarus, only one university trains specialists in the field of photography, and then in relation to graphic design. In the field of fine arts, everything is simpler - if you don't have an art education, you're an amateur (with rare exceptions, of course). Although there is no fundamental difference between easel graphics and photography (everything is built according to the same laws).
Anton Leshchinsky, you may be right, but I can't argue with that because I'm not a professional on the subject—I'm just an amateur! Thanks again for the interesting and helpful conversation!
I really liked it... But personally, I saw more meaning and awe in the hypothetical version without the reflection—the blade and feather would have resonated with me more... but that's purely my opinion. Excellent work
Regarding the frontal angle—won't a head-on perspective lead to a flat picture???—that's the question... at the moment, the pen gives at least some sense of volume in the frame precisely from this angle... and still, THANK YOU!!!
But personally, I saw more meaning and awe in the hypothetical version without the reflection—the blade and feather would have resonated with me more... but that's purely my opinion.
Excellent work